“…Other studies provide extensive detail around the development process itself (e.g. Meo‐Sewabu, 2015; New Zealand Government, 2019; Trebeck & Abeyasekera, 2012). This could be for several reasons; first, some constructs provide more detail as they are aiming to create and describe a framework for use by other researchers and practitioners.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… As an example of an explicit consideration of distributional equity related to health, the National Sustainable Development Plan for the Republic of Vanuatu lays out the following policy objective: to ‘Ensure that the population of Vanuatu has equitable access to affordable, quality health care through the fair distribution of facilities that are suitably resourced and equipped’ (DSPPAC, 2017, p. 11). As an example of inferred consideration of class/economic, health and livelihood/employment in relation to equity, the Oxfam Humankind Index discusses ‘deprived communities’, relying on the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2020 which defines deprivation in terms of income, employment and health (Trebeck & Abeyasekera, 2012; Dunlop & Swales, 2012). …”
Decades of theory and scholarship on the concept of human well‐being have informed a proliferation of approaches to assess well‐being and support public policy aimed at sustainability and improving quality of life.
Human well‐being is multidimensional, and well‐being emerges when the dimensions and interrelationships interact as a system. In this paper, we illuminate two crucial components of well‐being that are often excluded from policy because of their relative difficulty to measure and manage: equity and interrelationships between humans and the environment.
We use a mixed‐methods approach to review and summarize progress to date in developing well‐being constructs (including frameworks and methods) that address these two components.
Well‐being frameworks that do not consider the environment, or interrelationships between people and their environment, are not truly measuring well‐being in all its dimensions.
Use of equity lenses to assess well‐being frameworks aligns with increasing efforts to more holistically characterize well‐being and to guide sustainability management in ethical and equitable ways.
Based on the findings of our review, we identify several pathways forward for the development and implementation of well‐being frameworks that can inform efforts to leverage well‐being for public policy.
“…Other studies provide extensive detail around the development process itself (e.g. Meo‐Sewabu, 2015; New Zealand Government, 2019; Trebeck & Abeyasekera, 2012). This could be for several reasons; first, some constructs provide more detail as they are aiming to create and describe a framework for use by other researchers and practitioners.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… As an example of an explicit consideration of distributional equity related to health, the National Sustainable Development Plan for the Republic of Vanuatu lays out the following policy objective: to ‘Ensure that the population of Vanuatu has equitable access to affordable, quality health care through the fair distribution of facilities that are suitably resourced and equipped’ (DSPPAC, 2017, p. 11). As an example of inferred consideration of class/economic, health and livelihood/employment in relation to equity, the Oxfam Humankind Index discusses ‘deprived communities’, relying on the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2020 which defines deprivation in terms of income, employment and health (Trebeck & Abeyasekera, 2012; Dunlop & Swales, 2012). …”
Decades of theory and scholarship on the concept of human well‐being have informed a proliferation of approaches to assess well‐being and support public policy aimed at sustainability and improving quality of life.
Human well‐being is multidimensional, and well‐being emerges when the dimensions and interrelationships interact as a system. In this paper, we illuminate two crucial components of well‐being that are often excluded from policy because of their relative difficulty to measure and manage: equity and interrelationships between humans and the environment.
We use a mixed‐methods approach to review and summarize progress to date in developing well‐being constructs (including frameworks and methods) that address these two components.
Well‐being frameworks that do not consider the environment, or interrelationships between people and their environment, are not truly measuring well‐being in all its dimensions.
Use of equity lenses to assess well‐being frameworks aligns with increasing efforts to more holistically characterize well‐being and to guide sustainability management in ethical and equitable ways.
Based on the findings of our review, we identify several pathways forward for the development and implementation of well‐being frameworks that can inform efforts to leverage well‐being for public policy.
“…37 We found that people in Scotland most valued a safe home, being physically and mentally healthy, and a clean environment. Encouragingly, Scotland has taken steps to widen its measures of success through the National Performance Framework 38 -though there's much work to do to embed this alternative approach.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.