2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1507-1367(01)70380-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

10. The comparison between the three – field and four-field techniques of planning of radiotherapy in prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6][7] Despite many years of using 3D-CRT plans, the best beam arrangement is still discussed. [8][9][10][11][12][13] For this aim, also mathematical optimization methods are used. Sherouse 14 presented a method of 3D-CRT radiotherapy planning based on dose gradient analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] Despite many years of using 3D-CRT plans, the best beam arrangement is still discussed. [8][9][10][11][12][13] For this aim, also mathematical optimization methods are used. Sherouse 14 presented a method of 3D-CRT radiotherapy planning based on dose gradient analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%