2016
DOI: 10.1017/mag.2016.69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

100.16 The Diophantine equation n(x + y + z) = xyz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in the equation x + y = F with x, y, F ∈ Z + 0 , the sum of the least upper bounds for x and y is twice the least upper bound for (x + y). Application of the method of Stan Dolan [22] led to an upper bound (2F 2 + 2), which is even weaker than the upper bound derived from bounds for both terms according to [21]. With growing F, the ratio of the two bounds approaches 2:…”
Section: Uppermentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, in the equation x + y = F with x, y, F ∈ Z + 0 , the sum of the least upper bounds for x and y is twice the least upper bound for (x + y). Application of the method of Stan Dolan [22] led to an upper bound (2F 2 + 2), which is even weaker than the upper bound derived from bounds for both terms according to [21]. With growing F, the ratio of the two bounds approaches 2:…”
Section: Uppermentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The semiperimeter in their calculation equaled the sum of solution terms of the Diophantine Equation ( 8) with F = r 2 ; thus, they established an upper bound for the sum of solution terms of (8) to be (F + 1)(F + 2). In 2016, Stan Dolan published a new proof of their result [22]. We demonstrated his method in Section 2.2.…”
Section: Diophantine Equations Xy = F(x + Y) and Xyz = F(x + Y + Z): ...mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations