2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018pa003496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

100‐kyr Paced Climate Change in the Pliocene Warm Period, Southwest Pacific

Abstract: The mid to late Pliocene (~4.2–2.8 Ma.) represents an experiment in climate sensitivity to orbital pacing in which nearly all continental ice was confined to the Southern Hemisphere. Most studies have emphasized the dominant role of obliquity in determining changes in ice volume and temperature at this time, although most records come from the Northern Hemisphere, instead of the hemisphere where the bulk of ice resided. We present the first orbitally‐resolved, mid to late Pliocene Southern Hemisphere paired re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For 0.13–1.0 Ma, our age model is in alignment with the age model used by Schaefer et al (). In the oldest part of our record, our chronology also agrees well with the age model developed for the Pliocene interval of Site 1125 by Caballero‐Gill et al (), though both chronologies imply an offset toward younger ages during the latest Pliocene and early Pleistocene than those assigned to Site 1125 by Sabaa et al (). Our age model is much more highly temporally resolved than the biostratigraphy for Site 1125 (Shipboard Scientific Party, ) and is based on tuning cycles recorded by the same proxy (e.g., ∂ 18 O) rather than aligning related proxies (reflectance and ∂ 18 O), which may account for the different results.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For 0.13–1.0 Ma, our age model is in alignment with the age model used by Schaefer et al (). In the oldest part of our record, our chronology also agrees well with the age model developed for the Pliocene interval of Site 1125 by Caballero‐Gill et al (), though both chronologies imply an offset toward younger ages during the latest Pliocene and early Pleistocene than those assigned to Site 1125 by Sabaa et al (). Our age model is much more highly temporally resolved than the biostratigraphy for Site 1125 (Shipboard Scientific Party, ) and is based on tuning cycles recorded by the same proxy (e.g., ∂ 18 O) rather than aligning related proxies (reflectance and ∂ 18 O), which may account for the different results.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Site 1125 SST (green—this study, Caballero‐Gill et al, ) is shown in the context of North Pacific SST (yellow—Site 1012; LaRivière et al, ; brown—Site 1012; Venti et al, ), tropical upwelling SST (red—Site 846; Lawrence et al, ), South Atlantic SST (purple—Site 1090; Martínez‐Garcia et al, ), North Atlantic SST (blue—Site 607; Lawrence et al, ), and the benthic ∂ 18 O stack (black—Lisiecki & Raymo, ). Heavy lines represent a running 200 kyr average.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations