2012
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1000 Genomes-based imputation identifies novel and refined associations for the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium phase 1 Data

Abstract: We hypothesize that imputation based on data from the 1000 Genomes Project can identify novel association signals on a genome-wide scale due to the dense marker map and the large number of haplotypes. To test the hypothesis, the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) Phase I genotype data were imputed using 1000 genomes as reference (20100804 EUR), and seven case/control association studies were performed using imputed dosages. We observed two 'missed' diseaseassociated variants that were undetectable … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This SNP was not reported to be associated with any phenotypes according to the catalog of GWAS studies (http://www.genome.gov/gwastudies/) to date. Nevertheless, other SNPs within the IL2RA gene were found to be associated with T1D by Cooper et al [26] before the publication of [8] and by two other studies [27,28] after the publication of [8] using different approaches. Barrett et al [27] used genome-wide association studies giving a p-value of 1.0e-13 while Huang et al [28] used imputation of the genotypes based on the 1000 genome projects yielding a p-value of 5e-9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This SNP was not reported to be associated with any phenotypes according to the catalog of GWAS studies (http://www.genome.gov/gwastudies/) to date. Nevertheless, other SNPs within the IL2RA gene were found to be associated with T1D by Cooper et al [26] before the publication of [8] and by two other studies [27,28] after the publication of [8] using different approaches. Barrett et al [27] used genome-wide association studies giving a p-value of 1.0e-13 while Huang et al [28] used imputation of the genotypes based on the 1000 genome projects yielding a p-value of 5e-9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the gain of power and improvement in means of novel findings in the GWAS setting, a future effort should focus on applying the two-step approach to entire data sets, as earlier applied when analyzing the difference between HapMap and 1000 G imputation. 9 This comparison would surely require large sample sizes and the combination of several studies before an assessment of its value at meta-analysis level can be done.…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] Lowfrequency variants have not been scrutinized by most GWAS based on HapMap content. 7 Using newer reference panels for imputation will allow this (eg, the 1000 Genomes project based on resequenced data sets) with more variants with lower frequencies for the association analysis with traits 8 hereby increasing resolution and improving power 9,10 within the so-called next-generation GWAS. Newer arrays have been designed including marker content in the low-frequency spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prominent gene in the peak is the cut-like homeobox 2 (CUX2) gene. The CUX2 gene region has recently been associated with Type 1 diabetes in the 1000 Genomes Project using data from the WellcomeTrust Case Control Consortium [22]. To our knowledge this is its first association with albuminuria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%