2022 47th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter and Terahertz Waves (IRMMW-THz) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/irmmw-thz50927.2022.9895726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1030 nm optimized photoconductive receiver excited with >20 mW of THz average power

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of this difficulty in properly comparing DR values, we aim here to benchmark our setup in terms of DR to existing literature, thus we chose the same total acquisition time of 120 s as reported in the recent record DR from Kohlhaas et al [11]. In a previous conference submission, we used another receiver and reported, without a detailed parameter study, 80 dB in a 10 s measurement time [50]- [52], however this receiver was damaged due to its sensitivity to electrostatic discharges. In this follow-up detailed study, we use a second-generation receiver with a Zener-diode-based protection circuit to mitigate the danger of electrostatic discharge.…”
Section: Iii2 Noise Floor and Post-processing Of Thz Tracesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of this difficulty in properly comparing DR values, we aim here to benchmark our setup in terms of DR to existing literature, thus we chose the same total acquisition time of 120 s as reported in the recent record DR from Kohlhaas et al [11]. In a previous conference submission, we used another receiver and reported, without a detailed parameter study, 80 dB in a 10 s measurement time [50]- [52], however this receiver was damaged due to its sensitivity to electrostatic discharges. In this follow-up detailed study, we use a second-generation receiver with a Zener-diode-based protection circuit to mitigate the danger of electrostatic discharge.…”
Section: Iii2 Noise Floor and Post-processing Of Thz Tracesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of this difficulty in properly comparing DR values, we aim here to benchmark our setup in terms of DR to existing literature, thus we chose the same total acquisition time of 120 s as reported in the recent record dynamic range from Kohlhaas et al [11]. In a previous conference submission, we used another receiver and reported, without a detailed parameter study, 80 dB in a 10 s measurement time [48]- [50], however this receiver was damaged due to its sensitivity to electrostatic discharges. In this follow-up detailed study, we use a secondgeneration receiver with a Zener-diode-based protection circuit to mitigate the danger of electrostatic discharge.…”
Section: Ii2 Noise Floor and Post-processing Of Thz Tracesmentioning
confidence: 99%