2002
DOI: 10.1889/1.1830211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

11.3: Sensitivity of Display Reflection Measurements to Apparatus Geometry

Abstract: 1Reflection measurements made upon electronic displays can suffer from non-reproducibility owing to their possible strong dependence upon apparatus geometry. The geometrical dependence arises from non-Lambertian diffusion properties. We show the inadequacies of several conventional reflection measurement methods and offer some guidance on how these methods might be improved or replaced.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous investigations on display reflectance measurements, we have determined that the hemispherical diffuse reflectance measurement performed with an integrating sphere is the most robust, reproducible and unambiguous direct measurement among the conventional methods used to characterize display reflection. [3] In this paper, we present the measurement results obtained by use of a high-resolution in-plane BRDF apparatus and show the agreement of the hemispherical diffuse reflectance values calculated from the BRDF data with those measured by the use of integrating spheres. [4] 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In previous investigations on display reflectance measurements, we have determined that the hemispherical diffuse reflectance measurement performed with an integrating sphere is the most robust, reproducible and unambiguous direct measurement among the conventional methods used to characterize display reflection. [3] In this paper, we present the measurement results obtained by use of a high-resolution in-plane BRDF apparatus and show the agreement of the hemispherical diffuse reflectance values calculated from the BRDF data with those measured by the use of integrating spheres. [4] 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The conventional reflection measurements are sensitive to apparatus geometry and a reliable result cannot be easily obtained, [13] so the transmission spectra rather than reflection spectra were measured in our experiment. The transmission spectra T(λ) of the CLC cells were measured using diffused light produced by a 10 cm diameter integrating sphere as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The haze parameters are particularly difficult to measure, for the measurement can be sensitive to the geometry of the apparatus [2]. Thus, such parameters as the LMD distance, lens diameter, focus, source size, and source distance come into play.…”
Section: Reflection Metrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, the NIST DMP has established diagnostics and tools to address such issues as reflections [1,2], stray light [3] and color accuracy [4], and has supported the development of display standards [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%