2021
DOI: 10.1097/01.gox.0000734948.26844.9f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

11. Evaluating the ACAPS Standardized Letter of Recommendation for Application to Plastic Surgery Residency: Usefulness and Patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 A recent analysis of this process, though, revealed skewed data with more applicants being ranked either "1" or "2-5," which questions the objectivity of the letter. 29 Thus, additional investigations into the usefulness of the standardized letter are warranted. Other commonly cited subjective factors include performance on away rotations (discussed more below) and "grit."…”
Section: What Program Directors Look Formentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 A recent analysis of this process, though, revealed skewed data with more applicants being ranked either "1" or "2-5," which questions the objectivity of the letter. 29 Thus, additional investigations into the usefulness of the standardized letter are warranted. Other commonly cited subjective factors include performance on away rotations (discussed more below) and "grit."…”
Section: What Program Directors Look Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 28 A recent analysis of this process, though, revealed skewed data with more applicants being ranked either “1” or “2–5,” which questions the objectivity of the letter. 29 Thus, additional investigations into the usefulness of the standardized letter are warranted. Other commonly cited subjective factors include performance on away rotations (discussed more below) and “grit.” 16 Recently, Luce described both the importance of having and testing for emotional intelligence and grit in plastic surgery applicants, though the methods in which this may be carried out have not yet been validated, and are an area for future study.…”
Section: What Program Directors Look Formentioning
confidence: 99%