H∞-Control and Estimation of State-Multiplicative Linear Systems
DOI: 10.1007/11351429_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

11 Systems with State-multiplicative Noise: Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For given 𝛾 2 > 0, the FES ( 34) is H ∞ annular finite-time bounded w.r.t. (39), (41) (with M 2 replaced by 𝜃 −T 1 𝛾 2 2 I) and the following inequalities hold…”
Section: Main Results Under Dynamic Etm Theorem 4 Given Positive Scal...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For given 𝛾 2 > 0, the FES ( 34) is H ∞ annular finite-time bounded w.r.t. (39), (41) (with M 2 replaced by 𝜃 −T 1 𝛾 2 2 I) and the following inequalities hold…”
Section: Main Results Under Dynamic Etm Theorem 4 Given Positive Scal...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, due to the existence of mathematical expectations, there are significant differences in certain cases. The mathematical expectations of system state xfalse(tfalse)$$ \mathit{\mathcal{E}x}(t) $$ and external disturbance vfalse(tfalse)$$ \mathit{\mathcal{E}v}(t) $$ appear in system dynamics, which means that the mean‐field stochastic H$$ {H}_{\infty } $$ filtering problem cannot be addressed by the same methods given in References 38 and 39. To tackle this problem, a new Lyapunov functional (LF) is defined, and two equations about truexfalse(tfalse)prefix−truexfalse(tfalse)$$ \overline{x}(t)-\mathcal{E}\overline{x}(t) $$ and truexfalse(tfalse)$$ \mathcal{E}\overline{x}(t) $$ are introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provided that the H ∞ -FIR filter gain  N is obtained numerically using Theorem 1, the a posteriori H ∞ -FIR filtering estimate is computed by (5) with embedded (6) as…”
Section: The a Posteriori H ∞ -Fir Filtering Estimatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 This gives the best practical effect, albeit at expense of the accuracy obtained by optimal tuning. 4 In response to practical needs, different kinds of robust state observers and estimators have been developed during the last decades [5][6][7][8] for adaptive systems, state feedback control, and model predictive control. The most effective robust observers were obtained in the transform domain for linear time-invariant (LTI) systems, by minimizing estimation errors for maximized disturbances using the disturbance-to-error transfer function  .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SMC may not provide a satisfied performance for the system with unmatched disturbance [19]. H ∞ techniques offer distinct advantages over classical control methods, particularly in their applicability to problems of involving multivariable systems with crosscoupling between channels [12], [20]- [22]. However, it's important to acknowledge that the use of H ∞ techniques comes with certain challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%