2019
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(19)37397-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1130 – Transferable Iga-Reactive Microbiota Stratify Clinical Response to Fmt for Ulcerative Colitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of differences were observed between responders and non-responders after FMT ( Table 4 ). Several bacteria showed a relatively consistent trend in separate studies, in which the increased microorganisms included the phyla Bacteroidetes ( 22 , 36 ), the family Lachnospiraceae ( 14 , 27 , 30 , 31 , 34 ), and the genera Collinsella ( 33 , 34 ), Bacteroides ( 14 , 15 ), Blautia ( 14 , 34 ), Faecalibacterium ( 14 , 15 , 33 , 34 ), Eubacterium ( 11 , 15 ), Clostridium clusters IV ( 36 , 42 ), Roseburia ( 14 , 20 , 27 ), and Ruminococcus ( 11 , 30 , 42 ). In contrast, the relative abundance of the genera Enterococcu s ( 14 , 37 ), Lactobacillus ( 14 , 34 ), Veillonella ( 10 , 37 ), and Sutterella ( 14 , 42 ) was reported to decrease in responders.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of differences were observed between responders and non-responders after FMT ( Table 4 ). Several bacteria showed a relatively consistent trend in separate studies, in which the increased microorganisms included the phyla Bacteroidetes ( 22 , 36 ), the family Lachnospiraceae ( 14 , 27 , 30 , 31 , 34 ), and the genera Collinsella ( 33 , 34 ), Bacteroides ( 14 , 15 ), Blautia ( 14 , 34 ), Faecalibacterium ( 14 , 15 , 33 , 34 ), Eubacterium ( 11 , 15 ), Clostridium clusters IV ( 36 , 42 ), Roseburia ( 14 , 20 , 27 ), and Ruminococcus ( 11 , 30 , 42 ). In contrast, the relative abundance of the genera Enterococcu s ( 14 , 37 ), Lactobacillus ( 14 , 34 ), Veillonella ( 10 , 37 ), and Sutterella ( 14 , 42 ) was reported to decrease in responders.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In contrast, the relative abundance of the genera Enterococcu s ( 14 , 37 ), Lactobacillus ( 14 , 34 ), Veillonella ( 10 , 37 ), and Sutterella ( 14 , 42 ) was reported to decrease in responders. For the species level, responders had an increased abundance of the species Ruminococcus bromii ( 10 , 16 ), Eubacterium hallii ( 10 , 37 ), Eubacterium ventriosum ( 19 , 37 ), and F. prausnitzii ( 17 , 27 , 32 ), and reduced abundance of species Bacteroides vulgatus ( 19 , 37 ) , E. coli ( 18 , 30 , 37 ) , Escherichia-Shigella ( 29 , 30 ), and Sutterella wadsworthensis ( 10 , 37 ). A few of bacteria showed an opposite changing trend in their abundance, including the family Ruminococcaceae ( 33 , 34 ) and Christensenellaceae ( 30 , 34 ), the genus Escherichia ( 10 , 15 ), and the species Bacteroides ovatus ( 16 , 17 , 19 , 37 ) and Ruminococcus gnavus ( 16 , 37 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%