The Oxford Handbook of Criminology 2017
DOI: 10.1093/he/9780198719441.003.0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

12. Social harm and zemiology

Abstract: This chapter examines the relationships between social harm, zemiology, and criminology. It begins by reviewing some of the main arguments set out by those advocating a turn towards social harm and/or zemiology. It then elaborates on some of those arguments, first through illustrating the kinds of harms more significant than those captured by ’crime’ and, following that, to consider how these harms might take peculiar forms under neoliberalism. The chapter then turns to consider ‘criminological’ responses to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 9. It is worthwhile to call attention to the field of Zemiology here. Zemiologists argue that capitalist states may fail to label certain behaviors as crimes because governments in these systems will always support profit making over the health and well-being of their citizens (Hillyard and Tombs, 2017; Tombs and Whyte, 2015). When authorities fail to formally label social harms by the powerful as crimes, we would expect the use of the above neutralizations to be even more effortless. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 9. It is worthwhile to call attention to the field of Zemiology here. Zemiologists argue that capitalist states may fail to label certain behaviors as crimes because governments in these systems will always support profit making over the health and well-being of their citizens (Hillyard and Tombs, 2017; Tombs and Whyte, 2015). When authorities fail to formally label social harms by the powerful as crimes, we would expect the use of the above neutralizations to be even more effortless. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pemberton (2015: 32) has begun such an effort by noting 'we gain an understanding of harm exactly because it represents the converse reality of an imagined desirable state'. His approach is rooted in theories of human need, and others in the field of zemiology have advocated this as well (Copson 2011;Hillyard and Tombs 2017). However, based on the widespread environmental and ecological harms listed in this article, we argue that any theories of the 'good' must go far beyond mere human need.…”
Section: How To Rebuild the Harm Principlementioning
confidence: 85%
“…I will not rehearse the arguments ‘for’ a social harm perspective here (see Hillyard and Tombs 2017), suffice to say that for all the problems associated with the latter perspective there are good reasons why it is a useful lens through which to view the tragedy at Grenfell Tower. A social harm perspective overcomes (or some might say augments ) the focus on crime and criminal law, which, in the context of fatal injury, tends to be on acts, usually between proximate individuals, alongside the establishment of intention behind these acts.…”
Section: Grenfell As a Site Of State‐corporate Violencementioning
confidence: 98%