1993
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/1993/t49a/033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

122-channel squid instrument for investigating the magnetic signals from the human brain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
116
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 (Euroshield, Eura, Finland). The auditory evoked fields were recorded with a 122-channel MEG device (Neuromag, Helsinki, Finland;Ahonen et al 1993). Click stimuli (0.1-ms duration) were presented to the left ear at a rate of 10 Hz at 60 dB above an individually measured hearing threshold.…”
Section: Stimulus Design and Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 (Euroshield, Eura, Finland). The auditory evoked fields were recorded with a 122-channel MEG device (Neuromag, Helsinki, Finland;Ahonen et al 1993). Click stimuli (0.1-ms duration) were presented to the left ear at a rate of 10 Hz at 60 dB above an individually measured hearing threshold.…”
Section: Stimulus Design and Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ERF and ERP were recorded with a 122 channel MEG (Neuromag, Finland; Ahonen et al 1993) and 64-channel EEG (sampling rate 1 kHz) in each. Each two-channel sensor unit in MEG measured two independent magnetic field gradient components ∂ B z / ∂ x and ∂ B z / ∂ y, the z-axis being normal to the scalp.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEG/EEG was recorded (passband 0.03 -100 Hz, sampling rate 394 Hz) in a magnetically shielded room (Euroshield Ltd., Eura, Finland), where the subjects sat with their head inside a whole-head MEG instrument with 122 planar gradiometers [1] (4-D Neuroimaging Oy, Finland). Each two-channel MEG sensor unit measures two independent magnetic-field gradient components, dB z /dx and dB z / dy, the z-axis being normal to the local helmet surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%