“…This study has demonstrated that cough plates are less effective than cough swabs for isolating bacterial pathogens from non-expectorating CF patients; this data therefore reiterates the findings of Orska et al 9 but using a larger cohort of patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A comparison of cough plates with cough swabs and sputum specimens in 31 expectorating CF patients showed that cough plates were significantly more sensitive than cough swabs and were equivalent to sputum specimens 7. A subsequent abstract confirmed the increased efficacy of cough plates compared to cough swabs in 131 non-expectorating children with CF8 although a further abstract demonstrated the opposite result in 48 children 9…”
“…This study has demonstrated that cough plates are less effective than cough swabs for isolating bacterial pathogens from non-expectorating CF patients; this data therefore reiterates the findings of Orska et al 9 but using a larger cohort of patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A comparison of cough plates with cough swabs and sputum specimens in 31 expectorating CF patients showed that cough plates were significantly more sensitive than cough swabs and were equivalent to sputum specimens 7. A subsequent abstract confirmed the increased efficacy of cough plates compared to cough swabs in 131 non-expectorating children with CF8 although a further abstract demonstrated the opposite result in 48 children 9…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.