1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1023247428670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The writings of Sigmund Freud are reviewed, showing the similarities of many of his concepts with those of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). Automatic thoughts, core beliefs, and the desire to please the therapist are shown to have parallels in Freud's ideas about involuntary thoughts, the preconscious, the unconscious, and transference. Similarities in technique are noted, especially in light of Freud's original ideas about suggestion and influence as well as latter-day discoveries regarding Freud's actual … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially since board members operate under extreme circumstances with high power figures and high stakes, we suggest that future research should focus more on "unusual suspects" such as defensive routines (Argyris, 2011), confidential gossiping (Fan et al, 2020), informal conversations, power dynamics, politics, and silence (Morrison, 2014) since these aspects may shape and explain more of what happens in the boardroom (O'Reilly & Pfeffer, 2021) than "the usual suspects" (Finkelstein & Mooney, 2003). These findings underscore the need to explore deep-level attributes (i.e., underlying attributes, such as attitudes, values, and beliefs) and the preconscious (Javel, 1999) and subconscious processes that trigger fears, uncertainty, emotions and other biological and physiological processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Especially since board members operate under extreme circumstances with high power figures and high stakes, we suggest that future research should focus more on "unusual suspects" such as defensive routines (Argyris, 2011), confidential gossiping (Fan et al, 2020), informal conversations, power dynamics, politics, and silence (Morrison, 2014) since these aspects may shape and explain more of what happens in the boardroom (O'Reilly & Pfeffer, 2021) than "the usual suspects" (Finkelstein & Mooney, 2003). These findings underscore the need to explore deep-level attributes (i.e., underlying attributes, such as attitudes, values, and beliefs) and the preconscious (Javel, 1999) and subconscious processes that trigger fears, uncertainty, emotions and other biological and physiological processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%