Summary
All equine anaesthetists should take steps to mitigate the risk of anaesthetic‐related morbidities and mortalities where they can, and whilst some interventions against some of these are widely practiced, the number of approaches adopted by equine anaesthetists to mitigate the risk of airway obstruction suggests not only that the causes and severity of airway obstruction vary, but also that evidence for the superiority of any approach over another is limited. The limited evidence available suggests that the prevalence of severe airway obstruction in both the general and upper respiratory tract surgical equine populations is likely to be low, and that when cases do occur, rapid recognition and intervention often results in successful treatment. The above evidence considered with the understanding that pre‐emptively placing endotracheal or nasotracheal tubes in situ for recovery may only delay the recognition of some causes (e.g. laryngeal) of airway obstruction, alongside an awareness that this approach is not a benign risk‐free intervention, may lead some anaesthetists to re‐evaluate the perceived risk of respiratory obstruction and whether their chosen intervention will reduce that risk, potentially exacerbate it or introduce a further risk.