2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

151 A Prospective Study Comparing Urgent Video Capsule Endoscopy With Urgent Double-Balloon Enteroscopy in Patients With Massive Overt Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, CE can be used for diagnosis but not for treatment, whereas with BE, endoscopic diagnosis and treatment can be completed simultaneously, and a biopsy can be obtained for definitive diagnosis. Performing these examinations during bleeding contributes greatly to the detection of the bleeding source and to the selection of the method for the diagnostic evaluation of OGIB [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, CE can be used for diagnosis but not for treatment, whereas with BE, endoscopic diagnosis and treatment can be completed simultaneously, and a biopsy can be obtained for definitive diagnosis. Performing these examinations during bleeding contributes greatly to the detection of the bleeding source and to the selection of the method for the diagnostic evaluation of OGIB [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accurate and quick management by an expert endoscopist, either performing first-line BAE or preceded by CE, appears to be a key point in these patients. No evidence of the superiority of one over the other in the initial management has been found, 1 although there are specific cases that can benefit more from each technique. It makes sense to perform BAE initially in cases of previous OOGIB with a known bleeding source location (for example, previous CE reporting the location of vascular lesions or the level of the bleeding in recurrent patients), but its use in the emergency setting is still uncommon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of overt and occult forms varies in the different series to date but the most common presentation is occult-OGIB. However, emergency procedures in on-going OOGIB are rare, accounting for 1.79%–28.3% 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 of all patients reported. Most studies to date concerning emergency SB endoscopy have been retrospective series with a small number of patients and a few prospective randomized controlled trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timing in which DAE is performed can also influence the therapeutic yields. Recent studies reported that emergent DAE (< 24-72 h) resulted in endoscopic therapy in 28.6-57.5%, while non-emergent DAE resulted in endoscopic therapy in 13-50% [14,[24][25][26]. Concerning rebleeding, repeating DAE therapy after an initial therapeutic DAE may decrease the number of episodes of overt rebleeding in patients with recurrent OGIB [27].…”
Section: Small Bowel Bleedingmentioning
confidence: 99%