2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.newast.2009.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

155-day Periodicity in solar cycles 3 and 4

Abstract: The near 155 days solar periodicity, so called Rieger periodicity, was first detected in solar flares data and later confirmed with other important solar indices. Unfortunately, a comprehensive analysis on the occurrence of this periodicity during previous centuries can be further complicated due to the poor quality of the sunspot number time-series. We try to detect the Rieger periodicity during the solar cycles 3 and 4 using information on aurorae observed at mid and low latitudes. We use two recently discov… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Rieger type periodicity is found also in historical data sets during the earlier cycles. Using two historical aurorae data sets, Vaquero et al (2010) tried to evaluate presence of Rieger period during the cycles 3-4. They have detected the 150 day period in one auroral dataset during 1777-1781 (cycle 3), but they could not confirm the same periodicity for the cycle 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rieger type periodicity is found also in historical data sets during the earlier cycles. Using two historical aurorae data sets, Vaquero et al (2010) tried to evaluate presence of Rieger period during the cycles 3-4. They have detected the 150 day period in one auroral dataset during 1777-1781 (cycle 3), but they could not confirm the same periodicity for the cycle 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used here three sinusoidal tapers. Such a method has been previously and successfully used for the analysis of climate time series of different time scale and resolution (Ghil and Vautard, 1991;Yiou et al, 1996;Ghil et al, 2002;Anandan et al, 2004;Kilcik et al, 2008;Vaquero et al, 2010). Since this method is now standard, and can be found elsewhere, we do not describe it here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%