2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.3099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1569 Novel Augmented Reality Video Simulation for Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Surgery Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With an approved institutional review board protocol and animal use protocol (for the final user study) the 3 internal validation studies completed during development were 1) proof of concept: module 1, 14 2) mid development: modules 1 to 3 15 and 3) full-length procedure with comparison to an in vivo porcine model: modules 1 to 5 (results presented here). Expert surgeons who completed at least 100 robotic console cases were prospectively recruited to complete the simulation modules.…”
Section: Validation Of Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an approved institutional review board protocol and animal use protocol (for the final user study) the 3 internal validation studies completed during development were 1) proof of concept: module 1, 14 2) mid development: modules 1 to 3 15 and 3) full-length procedure with comparison to an in vivo porcine model: modules 1 to 5 (results presented here). Expert surgeons who completed at least 100 robotic console cases were prospectively recruited to complete the simulation modules.…”
Section: Validation Of Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, several studies quoted achieving 'face validity' as a goal. [53][54][55][56] However, face validity is recognised as being a poor measure due to the subjective nature of 'perceived realism' and lack of quantifiability, thus diminishing the overall impact of results. 57 On review, although the studies evaluated a number of criteria, there were several confounding factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%