2004
DOI: 10.1002/lapl.200410143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

157 nm fluorine laser ablation of wooden surfaces as an improved preparation technique for microscopy

Abstract: By means of 157 nm VUV short-wavelength laserirradiation the wood layer of damaged cells near the surface as well as deeper wood regions can be removed. As this is a nonthermal laser ablation-process, oxidation of the wood surface exposed to 157 nm under N 2 -atmosphere is avoided even with high power densities. By applying a mechanical pre-treatment process the wood structure is compressed and can then be removed with almost no damage. Four types of wood -spruce, pine, beech and oak -were ablated in all three… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experience so far regarding the application of UV laser irradiation for sample preparation for microscopy studies of wood and wood composites (Seltman, 1995;Wu & Seltman, 1998;Stehr et al, 1998;Sandberg, 1999;Kopp et al, 2005;Mertens et al, 2006;Sandberg & Sö derströ m, 2006;Segerholm et al, 2007;Almkvist, 2008) implies a number of obvious advantages compared with conventional sample preparation techniques: (1) the wood microstructure is efficiently revealed with no mechanically induced microcracks and redistribution of polymers or other mobile substances in the prepared surface;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The experience so far regarding the application of UV laser irradiation for sample preparation for microscopy studies of wood and wood composites (Seltman, 1995;Wu & Seltman, 1998;Stehr et al, 1998;Sandberg, 1999;Kopp et al, 2005;Mertens et al, 2006;Sandberg & Sö derströ m, 2006;Segerholm et al, 2007;Almkvist, 2008) implies a number of obvious advantages compared with conventional sample preparation techniques: (1) the wood microstructure is efficiently revealed with no mechanically induced microcracks and redistribution of polymers or other mobile substances in the prepared surface;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The cross cut is one of the three main cutting directions. This direction can be strongest ablated [9], so differences appear clearest. The samples, which were 20×10×10 mm 3 , were prepared by using a standard circular saw.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%