2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.04.170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

159. Evaluation of a user-guided deformable registration workflow for multi-modal (CT-MRI) prostate imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the dosimetric inaccuracies engendered by MR-CT registration defects would be of lower amplitude than those of the diagnostic inaccuracies. Nevertheless, the Reg Refine image registration tool has been validated previously for dosimetric applications in different clinical settings [ 52 ]–[ 55 ], including CT to T2-weighted MR images registration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, the dosimetric inaccuracies engendered by MR-CT registration defects would be of lower amplitude than those of the diagnostic inaccuracies. Nevertheless, the Reg Refine image registration tool has been validated previously for dosimetric applications in different clinical settings [ 52 ]–[ 55 ], including CT to T2-weighted MR images registration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T2-weighted, TSE-SSH MR, and CT Images were de-identified and uploaded into MIM (MIM Software, Inc, Cleveland, OH). CT images were registered to the T2-weighted, TSE-SSH images using the MIM Reg Refine deformable image registration tool [ 52 ]–[ 55 ]. Images were then visually inspected and loaded into MATLAB 2020a (MathWorks, Inc.) using the COMKAT Image Tool [ 56 ], [ 57 ], and intensities were normalized to [0, 1] for training.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%