2014
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(14)60016-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

16 Esophagogastric Junction Morphology May Be Useful to Predict a Positive Impedance-pH Monitoring in Patients With GERD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, patients with Type II EGJ tended to have a higher median number of reflux episodes, mean AET and a more frequently positive symptom association compared with patients with Type I EGJ (p < 0.02, p < 0.05 and p < 0.02, respectively). Rereflux episodes were more frequent in patients with Type III EGJ compared to patients with Type II and Type I EGJ (27 vs 14 [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], p < 0.01, vs 6 [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] p < 0.001), and this was true also for patients with Type II EGJ compared to patients with type I EGJ (p < 0.01). Overall, Type III and Type II had a more frequent probability to show a positive MII-pH than Type I EGJ (95%, p < 0.001, r = 0.233, CI: 0.079-0.511, vs 84% p < 0.003, r = 0.242, CI: 0.068-0.387; vs 50%, respectively; Fig.…”
Section: Motility Features and Egj Morphologymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, patients with Type II EGJ tended to have a higher median number of reflux episodes, mean AET and a more frequently positive symptom association compared with patients with Type I EGJ (p < 0.02, p < 0.05 and p < 0.02, respectively). Rereflux episodes were more frequent in patients with Type III EGJ compared to patients with Type II and Type I EGJ (27 vs 14 [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], p < 0.01, vs 6 [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] p < 0.001), and this was true also for patients with Type II EGJ compared to patients with type I EGJ (p < 0.01). Overall, Type III and Type II had a more frequent probability to show a positive MII-pH than Type I EGJ (95%, p < 0.001, r = 0.233, CI: 0.079-0.511, vs 84% p < 0.003, r = 0.242, CI: 0.068-0.387; vs 50%, respectively; Fig.…”
Section: Motility Features and Egj Morphologymentioning
confidence: 92%