International Law Between Universalism and Fragmentation
DOI: 10.1163/ej.9789004167278.v-0.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

16. Variations on the Theme of‘ Soft International Law’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be argued that the non-binding nature of these principles undermines their efficiency. The two sets of principles qualify as soft law (Neuhold, 2008; Shelton, 2009), but their importance in the context of international economic relations should not be underestimated (Bredimas et al , 2013; Kaufmann-Kohler, 2010). Similar processes are flexible and dynamic in nature, allowing for gradual consensus-building, evolution of norms and adaptation of states to the new norms (Boyle, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be argued that the non-binding nature of these principles undermines their efficiency. The two sets of principles qualify as soft law (Neuhold, 2008; Shelton, 2009), but their importance in the context of international economic relations should not be underestimated (Bredimas et al , 2013; Kaufmann-Kohler, 2010). Similar processes are flexible and dynamic in nature, allowing for gradual consensus-building, evolution of norms and adaptation of states to the new norms (Boyle, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%