2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

163. Unconstrained cervical disc replacements: is segmental hypermobility a concern?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…36,37 Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus regarding the term hypermobility; the existing literature contains inconsistent and seemingly arbitrary definitions. [18][19][20]38 Rather, hypermobility could be defined by ROM values that alter outcomes after CDA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…36,37 Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus regarding the term hypermobility; the existing literature contains inconsistent and seemingly arbitrary definitions. [18][19][20]38 Rather, hypermobility could be defined by ROM values that alter outcomes after CDA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of cervical arthroplasty devices is complex with particular ambiguity regarding the terms unconstrained, constrained, and semiconstrained 36,37. Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus regarding the term hypermobility; the existing literature contains inconsistent and seemingly arbitrary definitions 18–20,38. Rather, hypermobility could be defined by ROM values that alter outcomes after CDA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations