2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1071-3581(01)80854-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

18.2 Model-based analysis of gated cardiac PET images to assess left-ventricular volume and contractile function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessment of cardiac function by gated FDG PET without the need for other clinical modalities will significantly reduce the time and costs of pre-revascularization work-up. While MRI is considered the reference method for the assessment of LV volumes, most studies compared gated FDG PET with other techniques like gated SPECT, left ventriculography, and 2D echocardiography [75][76][77][78][79][80].…”
Section: Gated Fdg Petmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of cardiac function by gated FDG PET without the need for other clinical modalities will significantly reduce the time and costs of pre-revascularization work-up. While MRI is considered the reference method for the assessment of LV volumes, most studies compared gated FDG PET with other techniques like gated SPECT, left ventriculography, and 2D echocardiography [75][76][77][78][79][80].…”
Section: Gated Fdg Petmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to a significant improvement in image quality in humans. Beside that, ECG gating allows the calculation of functional parameters, such as volumes, ejection fraction or wall motion [5,8,16] which provides additional clinical parameters "for free" and was shown to improve diagnostic accuracy [1,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation coefficient for m LV was higher than those found in two previously published studies (r 5 0.82 (7) and 0.7 (9)), with a smaller difference and narrower range (2.3 6 18.1 g in our study as compared with 4 6 32 g in one of those previously published studies (9)). However, both of those studies (7,9) included patients with large defects whereas the current study did not. Areas with low tracer uptake may be more challenging to accurately delineate, explaining the difference in correlation between those two studies and ours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In addition, electrocardiogram-gated PET can be used to assess LV function, mass, and volume using a variety of PET tracers (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). However, quantification of molecular processes via tracer kinetic analysis requires dynamic scans whereas functional assessments of LV mass (m LV ) and volume require electrocardiogram-gated PET images.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%