2001
DOI: 10.1097/00006231-200105000-00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

18F-FDG labelling of human leukocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5] 18 FDG therefore cannot distinguish bacterial infections from other pathologies such as cancer and inflammation, and cannot diagnose bacterial infections at an early stage. [5a, 6] Although numerous experimental PET contrast agents have been developed for imaging bacterial infections, such as radiolabeled antibiotics, [7] antimicrobial peptides, [1a] antibodies [8] or white blood cells, [9] these agents have had minimal clinical impact. Several factors have contributed to the lack of success of bacterial imaging agents, such as poor clearance due to non-specific adsorption, low target receptor expression on bacteria, or complicated radiochemical synthesis, which are challenging to perform in clinical radiochemistry labs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] 18 FDG therefore cannot distinguish bacterial infections from other pathologies such as cancer and inflammation, and cannot diagnose bacterial infections at an early stage. [5a, 6] Although numerous experimental PET contrast agents have been developed for imaging bacterial infections, such as radiolabeled antibiotics, [7] antimicrobial peptides, [1a] antibodies [8] or white blood cells, [9] these agents have had minimal clinical impact. Several factors have contributed to the lack of success of bacterial imaging agents, such as poor clearance due to non-specific adsorption, low target receptor expression on bacteria, or complicated radiochemical synthesis, which are challenging to perform in clinical radiochemistry labs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%