2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2014.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[18F]-FDG PET-CT prediction of response to induction chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Preliminary findings

Abstract: These preliminary findings are promising. A larger sample, however, would be required in order to determine a more precise SUVmax reduction cut-off threshold during induction. Other methods for determining metabolic volume thresholds will be investigated. If functional imaging proves contributive, it could enable early screening of non-responders, avoiding unnecessary intoxication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three studies have evaluated response assessment with 18 F-FDG PET/CT after IC1 in HNSCC (21-23). However, none was designed to inform how best to personalize treatment based on response: one only investigated the correlation between PET parameters after IC1 and endoscopic response after IC before definitive treatment (22), and the other 2 had large variations in both the scanning timeline (anytime 2-4 wk after IC1) and the (A) Dot-plot of DTLG 40% after IC1 with suggested receiver-operator curve coordinates (−30%, −60%, and −82%) as cut-offs for predicting complete response to chemoradiotherapy. Optimal sensitivity and specificity achieved by DTLG 40% after IC1 as a standalone parameter were 73% and 80%, respectively (−60%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies have evaluated response assessment with 18 F-FDG PET/CT after IC1 in HNSCC (21-23). However, none was designed to inform how best to personalize treatment based on response: one only investigated the correlation between PET parameters after IC1 and endoscopic response after IC before definitive treatment (22), and the other 2 had large variations in both the scanning timeline (anytime 2-4 wk after IC1) and the (A) Dot-plot of DTLG 40% after IC1 with suggested receiver-operator curve coordinates (−30%, −60%, and −82%) as cut-offs for predicting complete response to chemoradiotherapy. Optimal sensitivity and specificity achieved by DTLG 40% after IC1 as a standalone parameter were 73% and 80%, respectively (−60%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 F-Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography ( 18 F-FDG-PET) has been applied in assessing the treatment response for NPC [4] and other tumors such as head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), [5,6] rectal cancer, [7] and breast cancer. [8] However, the complex anatomy of nasopharynx, low spatial resolution, and treatment-induced inflammation may decrease the accuracy of 18 F-FDG-PET.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limited number of patients in this study, coupled with the generally favorable PET responses to induction chemotherapy, precluded our ability to detect a correlation between PET changes and long-term oncologic outcomes. In contrast, several prior studies showed that post-induction FDG-PET responses correlated with subsequent PET responses and PFS [28][29][30]. The utility of FLT-PET in assessing responses after induction chemotherapy in HNSCC has only been evaluated by a small number of studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%