2005
DOI: 10.3892/or.14.5.1209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

18FDG-positron emission tomography in post treatment evaluation of residual mass in Hodgkin's lymphoma: Long-term results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The scores for internal and external validity are presented in Tables 8 (CT), 9 (FDG-PET), and 10 (FDG-PET/CT fusion). For the CT studies, the FDG-PET studies, and the FDG-PET/CT fusion studies, the total scores for combined internal and external validity, expressed as a fraction of the maximum score, ranged from 50% to 58% 38 2005…”
Section: Methodological Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The scores for internal and external validity are presented in Tables 8 (CT), 9 (FDG-PET), and 10 (FDG-PET/CT fusion). For the CT studies, the FDG-PET studies, and the FDG-PET/CT fusion studies, the total scores for combined internal and external validity, expressed as a fraction of the maximum score, ranged from 50% to 58% 38 2005…”
Section: Methodological Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of the 3 studies investigating CT [38][39][40] are displayed in Table 11. Only one study (separately) investigated patients with HD, with sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% and 85.6% (regionbased) for initial staging, and sensitivity and specificity of 85.7% and 75.6% (region-based) for restaging, respectively.…”
Section: Diagnostic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…При этом в зоне исходных поражений нередко выявляют остаточные образования, которые могут быть как активными опу-холями, так и носить посттерапевтический характер. Возможности дифференциации этих состояний при КТ весьма ограниченны [3,4]. Поэтому для оценки эффек-тивности лечения лимфом рекомендована позитрон-ная эмиссионная томография (ПЭТ) с 18-фтордезок-сиглюкозой (ФДГ), а при морфологических вариантах лимфом, вариабельно накапливающих ФДГ, -КТ [5].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…In 28 patients following treatment for HD, CT had a sensitivity of 25% and a specificity of 42% whereas PET had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 83% respectively. 16 …”
Section: Lymphomamentioning
confidence: 99%