1962
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5582(62)90726-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1961 nuclidic mass table

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The necessary experimental level energies are given in Tables I and II, which include results from several groups of workers. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] The resulting best-fit interaction provides a satisfactory description of the low-lying spectra of the Ni isotopes; the rms deviation between the measured and calculated values of the 24 fitted level energies is about 150 keV. A detailed comparison between theory and experiment is postponed to Sec.…”
Section: The Effective Two-body Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The necessary experimental level energies are given in Tables I and II, which include results from several groups of workers. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] The resulting best-fit interaction provides a satisfactory description of the low-lying spectra of the Ni isotopes; the rms deviation between the measured and calculated values of the 24 fitted level energies is about 150 keV. A detailed comparison between theory and experiment is postponed to Sec.…”
Section: The Effective Two-body Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences were calculated for proton and neutron systems from results of each of the thre~ methods, BCS, PBCS, and FBCS. .The experi.mental differences for comparison were done in similar fashion, using experimental masses of Kl:3nig,,22 Mattauch, and Wapstra with some adjustment (cf. Appendix A).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mass 20 a different situation holds: Using the lowest T = 1 level in Ne 20 and adding to it the Coulomb-energy difference obtained from Na 21 -Ne 21 corrected for radius to get a value of the Na 20 ground state, one obtains Na 20 -Ne 20 = 13.86, which is in very substantial disagreement with both the prediction in the paragraph above and the value currently accepted for this mass difference. 5 Considering the magnitude of the disagreement it seems that the current value for the mass of Na 20 is too high by at least 1 MeV. It should be noted that it has only been reported once, 11 and therefore certainly should be remeasured.…”
Section: M(att ) = A(at) + B(at)t +C(at)tmentioning
confidence: 91%