1990
DOI: 10.2172/6539150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1990 yearly calibration of Pacific Northwest Laboratory's gross-gamma borehole geophysical logging system

Abstract: OISTFIIIBLIJION OF "l'i fiGDOOUM_' ;I ' ',_q observed count rate in before-and after-logging field calibrations to equivalent uranium concentrations. The temperature drift of the gamma-ray probe was documented and amounts to less than 0.1%/°C within the temperature range O°C to 42°C. The low'energy cutoff for the gross gamma-ray probe was determined to be between 46.5 and 59.5 keV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Values computed by measurements on other scales and at different count rates suffer from either difficulty in precisely reading the count rate from the chart recorder output (at high count rates on high scales), sometimes coupied with the effects of hysteresis in the chart recorder, or insufficientstatisticsas a result of low count rates (low count rates on lower scales). Measurementstaken on the IOK scale without switchingto other scales will probably always give the most accurate dead-time correctionvalue• For example, using data from the previous report (Arthur 1990) on the IOK scale, one obtains a dead-time correction value of 12.2 _s as shown by the data in Table 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Values computed by measurements on other scales and at different count rates suffer from either difficulty in precisely reading the count rate from the chart recorder output (at high count rates on high scales), sometimes coupied with the effects of hysteresis in the chart recorder, or insufficientstatisticsas a result of low count rates (low count rates on lower scales). Measurementstaken on the IOK scale without switchingto other scales will probably always give the most accurate dead-time correctionvalue• For example, using data from the previous report (Arthur 1990) on the IOK scale, one obtains a dead-time correction value of 12.2 _s as shown by the data in Table 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A digitally based collection/recordingsystem was recently acquired, so that many of the procedureswere performed with the old analog system and the The initial base calibration of the system is described in a previous report (Brodeur and Koizumi • 1989), from which one can obtain a more thorough understanding of the basic function of the system. The base calibration report (Brodeur and Koizumi 1989) and the subsequent yearly calibration report (Arthur 1990 Tables I and 2, it was previously concluded (Arthur 1990) that the chart recorder had a nonlinear response in the middle region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…round by 2. The base calibrationreport (Brodeurand Koizumi 1989) and subsequent % yearly calibrationreports (Arthur 1990(Arthur , 1991(Arthur , 1992 Table 3. Measured linearityrefers to a least-squaresfit of output voltage versus percentageof full-scaleinput.…”
Section: System_ov_r_v Iewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for half of full scale. Because of the strict linearityobserved for the rate meters, as indicatedin Tables ] and 2, Arthur (1990) previouslyconcluded that the chart recorder had a nonlinearresponse in the mid-region,which continuesto be manifest. The nonlinearbehavior of the chart recorder is evident in the data resulting from the calibratedvoltagecheck (Table 4).…”
Section: Chart Recordermentioning
confidence: 99%