Alkali fusion after acid digestion method (AFAD) was used for determination by ICP-MS of twenty-five trace elements (Rb, Sr, Y, Zr, Nb, Cs, Ba, Hf, Pb, Th, U, and rare earth elements) in four silicate reference materials (JG-1a, JG-2, and JG-3 granitoids and JB-2 basalt) from the Geological Survey of Japan (GSJ). Results were compared with those obtained by acid digestion (AD) method. Our results are in excellent agreement with previously reported data obtained by fusion methods. The reproducibility of replicate analyses is better than 5% (1σ) for all the elements, except Rb, Cs, and Pb in JG-2.Keywords: silicate digestion method, trace element abundance, silicate reference material, alkali fusion
INTRODUCTIONAcid-resistant minerals, such as zircon, fluorides and chromite make rocks difficult to dissolve completely, leading to poor bulk rock trace element analysis. Although minor components, these minerals strongly affect bulk rock chemical composition because of the high abundance of Zr, Hf, and heavy rare earth elements (HREEs). The most widely accepted method for dissolving bulk rock powders is acid digestion (AD) with HF, HNO 3 , and HClO 4 (e.g., Yokoyama et al., 1999). However, acidresistant minerals are insoluble even with the use of Teflon bombs in microwave digestion technique (e.g., Jarvis and Jarvis, 1992;Yu et al., 2001) and fusion of rock powders with alkali flux up to 900°C is often used (e.g., Jarvis and Jarvis, 1992;Yu et al., 2001). Fusion methods are subject to matrix-induced instability during analyses owing to increased matrix elements from the flux (e.g., Li, B, C and Na). Pt or zirconium crucibles used for hightemperature fusion are another source of contamination. All these factors must be accounted for a correct application of fusion methods. Roser et al. (2000) proposed a method, referred to as Alkali Fusion after Acid Digestion (AFAD). This method consists of AD with HF-HClO 4 in a Pt-crucible, followed 100 R. Senda et al.ing at progressively increasing temperature up to 160°C (Fig. 1). The total time required to prepare 12 samples by AFAD was ~6 h, including preparations for ICP-QMS analyses.
ICP-QMS analysisICP-QMS analysis was performed on an Agilent 7500ce at IFREE/JAMSTEC (Supplementary Table S2) following Nakamura and Chang (2007). Calibration solutions (1, 10, 100, and 1000 pg/g) were prepared by gravimetric serial dilution (Table S1). For AD, the sample solutions were diluted 5,000-30,000 fold with a mixed solution of 2% HNO 3 and 0.1% HF by weight containing 1 ng/mL internal standard 115 In and 209 Bi. To reduce the effects of high C and Na concentrations in the matrix, we used >20,000 fold dilution for AFAD. Calibration solutions for AFAD were prepared by addition of standard solutions to the procedural blank solution prepared with the samples to match the matrix.Although the instrumental conditions were adjusted to maintain the best balance between high sensitivity and low oxide formation, we had to correct for overlaps between the spectra of oxides and hydroxides for some ...