2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.05.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1D and 3D surface-assisted self-organization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two most stable and essentially degenerate diagonal arrangements are shown in Fig. 6(b,c), which differ by a small change in relative positions of the TMTPP components as indicated by the core-to-core surface vectors of (5,4) and (6,3). In both bonded structures, the TMTPP molecules have a configuration and orientation similar to that of the most stable geometry of a single TMTPP molecule on the surface (Fig.…”
Section: (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The two most stable and essentially degenerate diagonal arrangements are shown in Fig. 6(b,c), which differ by a small change in relative positions of the TMTPP components as indicated by the core-to-core surface vectors of (5,4) and (6,3). In both bonded structures, the TMTPP molecules have a configuration and orientation similar to that of the most stable geometry of a single TMTPP molecule on the surface (Fig.…”
Section: (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both products are more stable than two unreacted de-H molecules by 0.58 eV, which means that upon dehydrogenation two (or more) approaching molecules are energetically driven to bond. The covalently linked (5,4) and (6,3) accommodated products exhibit a trans conformation of the interconnecting 1,2-ethylene group with an inter-core distance of ~19.4 Å and 19.0 Å, respectively. These connections also lead to slight offsets between the diagonals of the two molecules [32].…”
Section: (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations