2001
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2001)127:11(959)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1D Numerical Model of Muddy Subaqueous and Subaerial Debris Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to tsunami generation, the previously assumed slump basal shear strength of S u ≈0.8 MPa, and Coulomb friction coefficient of C n ≈0.11, were considered to be unrealistically high compared to available published values (e.g. Imran et al, 2001). These shear and friction values are now validated for slumps Watts et al, 2005a) even though the values are greater by one to two orders of magnitude than those of most translational landslides.…”
Section: Recent Modellingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…With regard to tsunami generation, the previously assumed slump basal shear strength of S u ≈0.8 MPa, and Coulomb friction coefficient of C n ≈0.11, were considered to be unrealistically high compared to available published values (e.g. Imran et al, 2001). These shear and friction values are now validated for slumps Watts et al, 2005a) even though the values are greater by one to two orders of magnitude than those of most translational landslides.…”
Section: Recent Modellingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Momentum and constitutive equations that describe landslide shape and motion over time can be relatively involved (Imran et al, 2001;Iverson and Denlinger, 2001). In contrast, the center of mass motion of dense landslides can be approximated by simple equations of motion, whether hot or cold, wet or dry (Savage and Hutter, 1989;Watts, 1997;Walder et al, 2003;Watts and Waythomas, 2004).…”
Section: Landslide Motion Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, a poor understanding of submarine landslide dynamics, in combination with the higher-order hydrodynamic theory needed to model dispersion and nonlinearity, have been major obstacles in understanding landslide tsunamis. Recent research, however, has resulted in new modeling methods to address both of these problems (e.g., Imran et al, 2001;Elverhøi et al, 2005;Lastras et al, 2005) that will undoubtedly lead to accelerated progress in estimating the severity of this natural hazard. Finally, the broad continental shelf also has a significant effect on the wave evolution of tsunamis (Shibata, 1983), particularly those generated from continental slope landslides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%