2019
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201902572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1D WO3 Nanorods/2D WO3−x Nanoflakes Homojunction Structure for Enhanced Charge Separation and Transfer towards Efficient Photoelectrochemical Performance

Abstract: Supporting Information and the ORCID identification number(s) for the author(s) of this article can be found under: https://doi.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The semicircle diameters of WO 3 /R-CoO and WO 3 /B-CoO both in the dark and light are much smaller than that of WO 3 , indicating the better interface charge transfer after coupling with R-CoO (or B-CoO). The lower charge transfer resistance between WO 3 and R-CoO (or B-CoO) is consistent with the higher bulk charge separation efficiency (g bulk ) and surface charge separation efficiency (g surface ), which can be calculated using the following formulas: g bulk (%) = J sulfite /J abs and g surface (%) = J water /J sulfite (see the ESI for calculation details) [44,45]. The experiment was conducted in 0.5 M sodium sulfate (Na 2 SO 4 ) with adding 0.5 M sodium sulfite (Na 2 SO 3 ) as a hole scavenger, and the results are presented in Fig.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Pec Performancessupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The semicircle diameters of WO 3 /R-CoO and WO 3 /B-CoO both in the dark and light are much smaller than that of WO 3 , indicating the better interface charge transfer after coupling with R-CoO (or B-CoO). The lower charge transfer resistance between WO 3 and R-CoO (or B-CoO) is consistent with the higher bulk charge separation efficiency (g bulk ) and surface charge separation efficiency (g surface ), which can be calculated using the following formulas: g bulk (%) = J sulfite /J abs and g surface (%) = J water /J sulfite (see the ESI for calculation details) [44,45]. The experiment was conducted in 0.5 M sodium sulfate (Na 2 SO 4 ) with adding 0.5 M sodium sulfite (Na 2 SO 3 ) as a hole scavenger, and the results are presented in Fig.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Pec Performancessupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In the photoelectrochemical (PEC) processes, photon utilization and charge separation are two of the most important factors affecting the overall energy conversion efficiency. Recently, various strategies have been reported to enhance photon absorption and electron-hole separation efficiency, such as constructing multijunction structure [19][20][21], tuning crystal facets [22][23][24], as well as defect engineering [25][26][27]. Although promising PEC performances have been achieved, the charge transfer mechanisms remain unclear and are still under debate in many cases [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several modification measures for PEC performances of WO 3 have been implemented in order to maximize the advantages of WO 3 photoanode, which include preparation of different nanostructures, [34,35] construction of heterojunctions as well as homojunctions [36,37] and doping of metallic or non-metallic elements. [38,39] Among these methods, the construction of heterojunctions formed by the coupling of WO 3 and a semiconductor with smaller band gap is considerably promising, which not only increases light absorption due to the small band gap semiconductor as light absorber, but also facilitates the separation of carriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%