1974
DOI: 10.1063/1.1680958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1H–17O spin-spin coupling constant in liquid water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(73). This value should be compared with J( 17 O, 1 H) = 89.8 ± 2.3 Hz obtained from the proton T 1q dependence on x 1 [633]. The J( 17 O, 1 H) was found to be independent of pH and temperature.…”
Section: Table 118mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(73). This value should be compared with J( 17 O, 1 H) = 89.8 ± 2.3 Hz obtained from the proton T 1q dependence on x 1 [633]. The J( 17 O, 1 H) was found to be independent of pH and temperature.…”
Section: Table 118mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The correction of Meiboom [635] for 17 O relaxation has been questioned [633,631]. Lankhorst et al [647] claimed that the lifetime s ex in Eqs.…”
Section: Table 118mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In studying the pH dependence of water proton T 2 relaxation times, Meiboom determined that the spin-5/2 nucleus 17 O was an important contributor to proton transverse relaxation (10 (16). This interaction is modulated by chemical exchange of protons between water molecules and by rapid longitudinal relaxation of 17 O.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[49] n In liquid nitromethane at 297 K. [6] o Liquid water. [5,50] p Gas phase. [7] q 2 J(D,H) in the gas phase.…”
Section: The Origin Of High Field Signal and Its 1 : 1 : 1 Splittingmentioning
confidence: 99%