2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmro.2022.100070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1H and 19F NMR chemical shifts for hydrogen bond strength determination: Correlations between experimental and computed values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1 H, 13 C and 15 N SSNMR chemical shifts are well known to be quite sensitive to protonic transfer, in particular for the heteronuclei ( 13 C and 15 N) in carboxylic and pyridinic moieties involved in the resulting hydrogen bonds [ 37 ]. The presence of hydrogen bonds in the crystals was assessed by 1 H MAS spectra; indeed, in general, all hydrogen-bonded 1 H chemical shifts appear to be higher for shorter distances between heavy atoms (i.e., stronger hydrogen bonds) and vice versa, in agreement with the literature [ 37 , 38 , 39 ]. All chemical shifts ( 1 H, 13 C and 15 N) are reported in detail in the Supplementary Materials (Tables S2–S4) while the comparisons between chemical shifts and distances between heavy atoms are reported in Table 1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 1 H, 13 C and 15 N SSNMR chemical shifts are well known to be quite sensitive to protonic transfer, in particular for the heteronuclei ( 13 C and 15 N) in carboxylic and pyridinic moieties involved in the resulting hydrogen bonds [ 37 ]. The presence of hydrogen bonds in the crystals was assessed by 1 H MAS spectra; indeed, in general, all hydrogen-bonded 1 H chemical shifts appear to be higher for shorter distances between heavy atoms (i.e., stronger hydrogen bonds) and vice versa, in agreement with the literature [ 37 , 38 , 39 ]. All chemical shifts ( 1 H, 13 C and 15 N) are reported in detail in the Supplementary Materials (Tables S2–S4) while the comparisons between chemical shifts and distances between heavy atoms are reported in Table 1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the 1 H MAS spectrum, the hydrogen-bond region (above 10 ppm) is characterised by one signal at 14.7 ppm (H1) and another one at 20.4 ppm (H8); the former is consistent with a pyridinium proton involved in a hydrogen bond of intermediate strength, the latter with the presence of a COOH group involved in very strong hydrogen bonds, usually an intramolecular interaction [ 37 , 38 , 39 ]; this agrees with both the intramolecular hydrogen bond between carboxylic groups present in the experimental crystal structure of the system and the short distance between heavy atoms (see Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has long been recognized that proton chemical shifts are affected by hydrogen bonding. In the case of solitary water, the OH-stretching frequency is exquisitely sensitive to hydrogen bonding, and it has been shown to provide a convenient measure of solvent hydrogen-bond accepting ability (“β”). , Throughout this work, we use shifts in the average frequency of the OH-stretching band of solitary water, Δν OH = ν OH gas – ν OH solution , as the primary measure of the strength of water-solvent electrostatic interactions. In Figure a, we compare water–benzene chemical shift differences, Δδ W  – (δ W – δ B ), to OH stretching frequencies in a variety of dipolar (blue) and ionic (red) solvents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 However, there is a gap of knowledge on nonconventional intramolecular H-bond interactions that needs to be assessed in order to fully understand the role this kind of interaction plays in the conformational stability and preference of molecules, and also to enhance the conformational design protocols in drug discovery, 5 for example. Furthermore, the rapid ascension of fluorinated molecules in the pharmaceutical field [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] highlights the demand for a better under-standing of the effects caused by the insertion of fluorine atom(s) on organic molecules, their stereoelectronic effects and the influence of hydrogen bonding [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] on their conformational preference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%