1K bit bubble lattice storage device: Initial tests

Hu, H. L.; Beaulieu, T.J.; Chapman, D.W.; Franich, D. M.; Henry, G. R.; Rosier, Laurence; Shew, Lester F.

doi:10.1063/1.324803

Cited by 12 publications

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Current-Access Magnetic Bubble Circuits

Bobeck¹,

Blank²,

Butherus³

et al. 1979

Bell System Technical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Experimental and theoretical results from our work on current‐access technology show promise for high‐density, ∼107 bits/cm2, and high‐frequency, f > 1 MHz, bubble devices. We have operated current‐access devices where the bubble‐driving fields derive from two patterned conducting sheets instead of orthogonal field coils. Margins for generation, propagation, and transfer were studied on 8‐μm periods at 1 MHz. These 8‐μm period structures typically required 1.5 mA/μm per conducting sheet and dissipated 14 μW/bit. Single conducting‐sheet, current‐access circuitry also propagates bubbles but offers less design flexibility. We present design criteria, magnetic field equations, and design curves. Implementation of these devices required new magnetic materials with quality factor Q comparable to available garnets, yet higher mobility and lower dynamic coercivity. Of the three systems, (YLuSmCa)3(FeGe)5O12, (LaLuSmCa)3(FeGe)5O12, and (LaLuSm)3(FeGa)5O12, the last appears best suited; some room temperature characteristics of the composition La0.6Lu2.1Sm0.3Ga0.9Fe4.1O12 are 4πMs = 470G, μ = 750 cmS−1‐Oe−1, d = 1.6 μm, and ΔHc = 2 Oe across a bubble for the threshold of motion. Necessary improvements in processing were made with a radio‐frequency, chlorine‐containing plasma etch which produced metal patterns identical to those of the etch mask. We anticipate that current‐access devices, when compared to conventional field‐access devices, will achieve higher data rates, lower power consumption per bit, and greater storage densities with existing processing technologies.

show abstract