“…The CoSe 2 /MoSe 2 catalyst shows a lower overpotential (η 10 of 280 mV) than those of the CoMoO 4 (352 mV), CoSe 2 (322 mV), MoSe 2 (404 mV), and RuO 2 (318 mV), respectively. More importantly, the OER performance of the designed CoSe 2 /MoSe 2 sample exceeds those of recently reported selenide catalysts in OER, for instance, the Ag-CoSe 2 (320 mV) (Zhao et al, 2017), CoSe 2 NCs (430 mV) (Kwak et al, 2016), CoSe 2 /DETA (392 mV) (Guo et al, 2017), NiCo 2 Se 4 holey nanosheets (295 mV) (Fang et al, 2017), NiSe-Ni 0.85 Se/CP (300 mV) (Chen et al, 2018a), SWCNTs/MoSe 2 (295 mV) (Najafi et al, 2019), 1T/2H MoSe 2 (397 mV) (Li et al, 2019), and CoSe 2 @MoSe 2 (309 mV) (Chen et al, 2019c) (Table S2). Furthermore, the corresponding Tafel slope of CoSe 2 /MoSe 2 is 86.8 mV•dec −1 , which is smaller than those of the CoMoO 4 (101.8 mV•dec −1 ), CoSe 2 (124 mV•dec −1 ), MoSe 2 (130 mV•dec −1 ), and RuO 2 (93.4 mV•dec −1 ).…”