2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2.3 THz radiation: Absence of genotoxicity/mutagenicity in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be assumed that in this case a membrane also functions as a screen which does not allow any impact of the external THz field on the process of differentiation. The third type of non-sensitive cells is bacterial cells [18]. We believe that in this case a membrane also protects a microorganism from the external THz field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be assumed that in this case a membrane also functions as a screen which does not allow any impact of the external THz field on the process of differentiation. The third type of non-sensitive cells is bacterial cells [18]. We believe that in this case a membrane also protects a microorganism from the external THz field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Currently, there is no consensus on this issue. Some studies have demonstrated that this effect does not occur [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], whereas in other works the effect was clearly displayed [10][11][12][26][27][28]. Particularly, experiments in papers [19,20,25,28] showed different results after exposure of THz radiation of approximately same frequency (0.10 -0.15 THz) and power density (0.04 -5 mW/cm 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to precisely measure the influence of CW THz radiation on different objects, including biological ones [15], it is crucial to have a stable average THz power over a long period of time (hours). However, this is quite a challenging task.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, increasing research attention has been focused on the frequency range near 0.1 THz (0.031-5 mW/cm 2 ) [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], which studied genomic instability and damage, genotoxicity, morphological changes, enzyme activity, etc. In addition, a number of studies have focused on the frequency range near 2 THz (0.03 mW/cm 2 -1.4 W/cm 2 ) [14][15][16][17][18][19], which studied gene expression, DNA damages, genotoxicity, inflammatory responses and stress systems etc. Research that examines the biological effects of exposure to the 0.2-2.0 THz frequency range is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%