2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11770-014-0455-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2.5D induced polarization forward modeling using the adaptive finite-element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equivalent conductivity method was used while the induced‐polarization was being modelled (Weller, Frangos and Seichter ; Ye et al . ). The equivalent conductivity is defined as ση=σfalse(1ηfalse) that contains induced‐polarization where η is the chargeability.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The equivalent conductivity method was used while the induced‐polarization was being modelled (Weller, Frangos and Seichter ; Ye et al . ). The equivalent conductivity is defined as ση=σfalse(1ηfalse) that contains induced‐polarization where η is the chargeability.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Analysis by 2.5D forward modeling is based on the background/anomalous-filed algorithm. In order to eliminate the time and strike components, it is usually manipulated in the Laplace and Fourier domains and calculated using the finite element method (FEM) [21][22][23][24]. The inverse Laplace and Fourier transforms are used to recover the solution in the time domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%