1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6336(11)80080-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2.6 Flow cytometric steroid receptor analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the present study, we did not observe any major cell-cyclerelated changes in ER expression of cells stained simultaneously for both DNA content and ER expression. This observation is in agreement with the results of Schutte et al (13).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the present study, we did not observe any major cell-cyclerelated changes in ER expression of cells stained simultaneously for both DNA content and ER expression. This observation is in agreement with the results of Schutte et al (13).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…These receptor-negative cells effectively lower the MFC value for any given sample (14). Various modifications of the fixation procedures and/or permeabilization have been employed to increase immunostaining, with limited success (11,13,14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow-cytometric method has been shown to compare favourably with the radioligand-binding assay (P = 1 x 10-5) usually used to detect ER in breast tumours. The monoclonal antibody DAKO-ER 1D5, which reacts with the N-terminal domain (A/B region) of the receptor (Kumar et al, 1987), has been shown to give a good correlation immunohistochemically with results obtained by biochemical quantification (Schutte et al, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The presence of ER␣ receptors was determined in MEC suspensions by microwave permeabilization (22) and flow cytometry (23). MEC were harvested with trypsin (0.025%), washed and 10 6 cells fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at 4 C, washed and resuspended in 0.01 mol/ liter citrate buffer, pH 6.0, and microwaved for 30 sec on High (500W), washed and resuspended in PBS/1% FCS.…”
Section: Er␣ Expression By Flow Cytometrymentioning
confidence: 99%