2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11128-021-03015-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2-designs and redundant syndrome extraction for quantum error correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to stabilizer of different weights being measured in our SM scheme, resulting in a different number of total measurements being done. Ashikhmin et al [3] and Premakumar et al [26] sidestep this issue by choosing stabilizer code whose non-identity stabilizer elements are all of the same weight or of almost the same weights. While this is the case for the stabilizer group of the 9-qubit Bacon-Shor code, it is not true for the Shor code, which has Z-stabilizer generators that range from weight-2 to weight-6.…”
Section: Starting With Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is due to stabilizer of different weights being measured in our SM scheme, resulting in a different number of total measurements being done. Ashikhmin et al [3] and Premakumar et al [26] sidestep this issue by choosing stabilizer code whose non-identity stabilizer elements are all of the same weight or of almost the same weights. While this is the case for the stabilizer group of the 9-qubit Bacon-Shor code, it is not true for the Shor code, which has Z-stabilizer generators that range from weight-2 to weight-6.…”
Section: Starting With Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent work on QDS codes has included more efficient decoding techniques [21], [28], connections to the theory of 2designs [26], and an extension to quantum convolutional codes [38]. Recently, Wagner et al [36] showed how QDS codes can be used to estimate a logical channel with a phenomenological Pauli noise model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After an error stage represented by the circuit element E ∈ {I, X 1 , X 2 , X 3 }, we consistently observe that two stabilizer prompts exhibit errors, while one stabilizer prompt remains error-free. This strategy has been used in combination with 2-designs to improve the fault tolerance of error correction circuits [96]. In addition, its combination with our parity-controlled gate will yield even more unexpected results.…”
Section: B Distance-3 Repetition Codementioning
confidence: 99%