2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-46515-7_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2-Dimension Ham Sandwich Theorem for Partitioning into Three Convex Pieces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results, which seems to be essentially equivalent to the following 3-cutting Theorem, were obtained in [39] and [19], respectively. …”
Section: Lemma 31 (The Intermediate Line Lemma) Let K ≥ 0 Be An Intsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar results, which seems to be essentially equivalent to the following 3-cutting Theorem, were obtained in [39] and [19], respectively. …”
Section: Lemma 31 (The Intermediate Line Lemma) Let K ≥ 0 Be An Intsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The following theorem, which was conjectured in [21] and proved for a = 1, 2 in [21] and [26], was completely proved by Bespamyatnikh, Kirkpatrick and Snoeyink [7], Sakai [39] and by Ito, Uehara and Yokoyama [19] independently. Note that for g = 2, it is equivalent to the Ham-Sandwich Theorem above.…”
Section: Draftmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Very recently the conjecture of Kaneko and Kano has been independently proven by Ito et al [10] and Sakai [16]. Comparing our result with papers [10] and [16] we can say that they prove essentially the same 3-cutting theorems but both use different (and somewhat more complicated) techniques.…”
Section: Theorem 2 (3-cutting) For Any Gn Red Points (G~2) and Gm Blsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Recall that this question arose in connection with some partition problems in discrete and computational geometry, [1], [5], [11], [12], [19] [22]. It turns out that Problem 1 is closely related to a problem of the existence of equivariant maps, see Problem 3 in Section 2.2.…”
Section: The Motivating Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%