2 mm conventional miniplates with three-dimensional strut plate in mandibular fractures

Kaushik, Shishir; Azhar, Iqbal; Dubey, Mithilesh Kumar; Bajpai, Neha

doi:10.4103/ams.ams_73_19

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There was a statistically significant difference among the groups, which was similar to studies conducted by Mittal et al , Tiwari et al , Kaushik et al , and Mohammad et al . [ 15 17 18 19 ] Post-op intermaxillary fixation was required in all patients for one week and two patients each in the 3D plate group and the miniplate group for one month. This was in contrast to study by Balakrishnan et al ., Malhotra et al , and Agnihotri et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of different osteosynthesis modalities with respect to lingual splaying in mandibular interforaminal fractures using CBCT: A prospective study

Mittal,

Garg,

Rathi

et al. 2024

National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The management of interforaminal fracture can prove to be challenging because of its unique anatomy and muscular forces. Often, lingual splaying has been found either postoperatively or even during the procedures in such fractures and can be challenging when it comes to managing them. Various modalities such as miniplates, lag screws, and three-dimensional (3D) miniplates have been utilized to manage these fractures. This article compares these three modalities in the management of lingual splaying. Material and Methods: Thirty patients were allotted randomly to either of the aforementioned modalities randomly in this prospective study. The patients were operated and followed up for the period of 6 months. Results: It was found that no significant difference exists between the modalities in terms of reduction in lingual splay. Conclusion: All three modalities have different ventures to offer. A larger sample size study may be warranted to elucidate the obtained results.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of different osteosynthesis modalities with respect to lingual splaying in mandibular interforaminal fractures using CBCT: A prospective study

Mittal,

Garg,

Rathi

et al. 2024

National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[ 29 ] Kaushik S et al . [ 30 ] (2020) compared 3D plates with conventional miniplates in the treatment of mandibular fractures. 3D plates showed no statistically significant advantage over single miniplate; however, study parameters were better in 3D plate group in both studies with advantages such as less operating time, ease of application, and cost-effective over the conventional plate system.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

New design titanium miniplate versus conventional miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fractures: A comparative study

Vishnani,

Pattanshetti,

Gilani

et al. 2023

National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Mandibular angle fracture (MAF) is the second most common site of all fractures of the mandible with the highest complication rate. Management of MAF has evolved in the past four decades. The purpose of the prospective study was to compare the efficacy of new design titanium miniplate (NDM) with conventional titanium miniplate (CTM) in the treatment of MAF. Objectives: Mouth opening, occlusion, bite force measurement, and radiographs compared preoperatively and first week, first month and third month postoperatively. Materials and Method: Fourteen patients diagnosed with MAF were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (seven patients) was treated with NDM and Group B (seven patients) with CTM. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at an interval of one week, one month and three months. Results: Repeated measures ANOVA and Post hoc Tukey test showed a significant increase in bite force and mouth opening for both groups in first and third postoperative months. Unpaired t-test showed slightly better mouth opening in Group B and slightly higher bite force in Group A. Discussion: Both miniplates fulfilled all the study objectives and equally satisfactory healing was seen at the end of third month. NDM offers better stability, rigidity, and anatomic reduction of the fracture with a drawback of difficulty in adaptation and increased operative timing compared to CTM. Hence, we would like to conclude that both miniplates are equally efficient in the treatment of non-comminuted angle fractures with the NDM having upper hand in stability.

show abstract

“…The purpose of this study was to characterise the types of immobilisation systems in traumatic mandibular fractures depending on children’s age, occlusion stage, fracture location, type and the presence of fragment displacement. [ 4 5 6 ]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Paediatric Mandibular Fracture Management - A Seven Year Retrospective Study

Yehorov,

Yakovenko,

Primak

2023

Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Mandibular fractures are one of the most frequent and complex types of traumatic injuries of the maxillofacial region in children. Given significant long-term sequelae of inappropriate healing, adequate diagnosis and choice of management, which takes into account the patient’s age and fracture characteristics, are paramount. Methods: The data for this study were obtained from the medical records of patients treated in the Department of Surgical Dentistry and Paediatric Maxillofacial Surgery of the Bogomolets National Medical University from 2014 to 2020. Age, gender, fracture pattern and surgical treatment methods performed in these patients were recorded and analysed. Results: A total of 302 children with 376 traumatic fractures of the mandible were managed during the study period. The largest number of fractures was found in the condylar processes region, 42%, and in the body of the mandible, 40%. The majority of patients were males and in the 13–17 age group (147 [49%] cases). Tigerstedt’s maxillary-mandibular fixation splint was used in the majority of cases, alone or in the combination with open or internal fixation. Discussion: Whilst the most common type of immobilisation in children in our series was Tigerstedt’s maxillary-mandibular fixation splint, its use is limited to the variable bite period. Alternative fixation options are discussed.

show abstract

2 mm conventional miniplates with three-dimensional strut plate in mandibular fractures

Cited by 9 publications

References 18 publications

Comparative evaluation of different osteosynthesis modalities with respect to lingual splaying in mandibular interforaminal fractures using CBCT: A prospective study

Comparative evaluation of different osteosynthesis modalities with respect to lingual splaying in mandibular interforaminal fractures using CBCT: A prospective study

New design titanium miniplate versus conventional miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fractures: A comparative study

Paediatric Mandibular Fracture Management - A Seven Year Retrospective Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About