Duoethnography in English Language Teaching 2020
DOI: 10.21832/9781788927192-004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2. Not all Eikaiwas (or Instructors) are Created Equal: A Trioethnography of ‘Native Speaker’ and ‘Non-native Speaker’ Perspectives on English Conver sation Schools in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although previous studies noted that NNESTs feel professionally obligated to value Western cultures with which they are not familiar due to native-speakerism (see Moussu & Llurda, 2008), the reverse is also true for NESTs in EFL contexts who feel obligated to adhere to local cultures in which they may not be well versed (see also Hiratsuka, 2022;Hooper et al, 2020;Stanley, 2013). Native-speakerism therefore has repercussions for both NNESTs and NESTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although previous studies noted that NNESTs feel professionally obligated to value Western cultures with which they are not familiar due to native-speakerism (see Moussu & Llurda, 2008), the reverse is also true for NESTs in EFL contexts who feel obligated to adhere to local cultures in which they may not be well versed (see also Hiratsuka, 2022;Hooper et al, 2020;Stanley, 2013). Native-speakerism therefore has repercussions for both NNESTs and NESTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They noted that the impact of native-speakerism can be varied and complex, "depending not only on context and geography, but also on such factors as personal disposition and unpredictable events" (p. 12). Hooper et al (2020) undertook a trioethnography, zeroing in on the idiosyncratic identity work of the three researcher-participants within the study. As former or current private English conversation schoolteachers (one British and two Japanese), the researchers challenged the common portrayal of private English conversation schools in Japan as sites that fulfill their clients' desires for cross-cultural exchange rather than as sites of learning.…”
Section: Native-speakerismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussing plurilingual graduate student writing, Corcoran and colleagues (2018) utilize Skype conversations as well as email chains and comments in Google Documents. Other studies have used online documents (Hooper et al, 2020), classroom observations (Lawrence & Nagashima, 2020), pictures, music and websites (Nagashima & Hunter, 2020), narrative writing (Warren & Park, 2018), and other various tools, to support their duoethnographic studies. In these studies, researchers move beyond face-to-face dialogues and find creative ways to have critical and in-depth interactions both with fellow duoethnography participants and various physical and digital artefacts .…”
Section: Duoethnographic "Methods" In Elt/applied Linguisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, our conversations with each other and interactions with literature were going to be the data utilized for our study, but as we progressed throughout our 6-month data collection, an unexpected artefact emerged: social media. While we used various online communication forums to discuss with each other, as other studies have done (e.g., Adamson & Muller, 2018;Hooper et al, 2020), Patrick's use of prominent social media platforms (e.g., Twitter, Facebook, etc.) became part of the duoethnography as his interactions brought about new understandings of the topics discussed.…”
Section: Our Duoethnographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This notion of challenging and reframing established narratives is widely regarded as a central tenet of duoethnography. In numerous studies, this has resulted in a duoethnographic approach being utilized in order to unpack "common sense" beliefs within areas such as race, sexuality, native-speakerism, and language policy in language education (Hooper & Iijima, 2019;Hooper, Oka, & Yamazawa, 2020;Lowe & Kiczkowiak, 2016;Norris, Sawyer, & Lund, 2012;Wongsarnpigoon & Imamura, 2021). The transformative dialogue in these studies simultaneously facilitated the disruption of dominant metanarratives relating to the research foci and, in many cases, led to personal growth on the part of the researchers.…”
Section: Transformative Dialoguementioning
confidence: 99%