Vapor Pressure and Antoine Constants for Nitrogen Containing Organic Compounds
DOI: 10.1007/10688591_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2 Organic Compounds, C0 to C84

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 376 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strong effect of RTIL−solute interactions is most readily apparent when considering the range of solute retention factors against the range of solute vapor pressures. At 313 K, for example, the solute retention factors range well within 3 orders of magnitude (see Tables and ), whereas the solute vapor pressures , span across more than 5 orders of magnitude (anisole 1148 Pa, pyrene 3.6 × 10 -3 Pa). To separate the effect of solute volatility from the effects of solute−RTIL and solute−scCO 2 interactions, it is expedient to consider the quantity ( K cA / K cB )( P A sat / P B sat ), where P A sat and P B sat are the vapor pressure of solute A and the vapor pressure of naphthalene at the particular temperature, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The strong effect of RTIL−solute interactions is most readily apparent when considering the range of solute retention factors against the range of solute vapor pressures. At 313 K, for example, the solute retention factors range well within 3 orders of magnitude (see Tables and ), whereas the solute vapor pressures , span across more than 5 orders of magnitude (anisole 1148 Pa, pyrene 3.6 × 10 -3 Pa). To separate the effect of solute volatility from the effects of solute−RTIL and solute−scCO 2 interactions, it is expedient to consider the quantity ( K cA / K cB )( P A sat / P B sat ), where P A sat and P B sat are the vapor pressure of solute A and the vapor pressure of naphthalene at the particular temperature, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To calculate the molar volumes of subcooled liquid solutes, one can use a modified form of the Rackett equation employing a reference density and the critical properties estimated from the Joback correlation . The solubility parameters of the subcooled liquid solutes then result from combining the molar volumes with the cohesive energies obtained from vaporization enthalpy data or from vapor pressure equations . Figure shows the estimations of δ s obtained with anisole and α-ionone as the test solutes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate the molar volumes of (subcooled) liquid solutes, one can use a modified form of the Rackett equation employing a reference density and the critical properties estimated from the Joback correlation . The solubility parameters of the (subcooled) liquid solutes then result from combining the molar volumes with the cohesive energies obtained from vaporization enthalpy data or from vapor pressure equations . At a particular temperature and pressure, the pertinent value of δ m can be derived from the EOS of Span and Wagner …”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%