2006
DOI: 10.1002/pip.696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

20·5% efficient silicon solar cell with a low temperature rear side process using laser-fired contacts

Abstract: The paper presents a rear side structure for crystalline silicon solar cells, which is processed at a maximum temperature of 220°C. Using two different material compositions for electrical and optical needs, the layer system has excellent passivation properties, enhances light trapping and allows for a good ohmic contact. With this structure we achieve an independently confirmed conversion efficiency η=20·5% on a 250 μm thick silicon solar cell. Due to the fact that the maximum process temperature is 220°C, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Good S rear values of only 300-500 cm/s were obtained for the UV laser source, while these values were approximately doubled when the contacts were made with the VIS laser. The S rear value can be interpreted as the effective surface recombination that results from the initially well passivated rear surface and the much higher recombination velocity at the laser-fired contacts [11]. Note that the fraction of contacted area was rather low and very similar for both laser sources (f≈1%).…”
Section: Rear Surface Recombination Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Good S rear values of only 300-500 cm/s were obtained for the UV laser source, while these values were approximately doubled when the contacts were made with the VIS laser. The S rear value can be interpreted as the effective surface recombination that results from the initially well passivated rear surface and the much higher recombination velocity at the laser-fired contacts [11]. Note that the fraction of contacted area was rather low and very similar for both laser sources (f≈1%).…”
Section: Rear Surface Recombination Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the implementation of point contact structures is now more viable owing to the fast development of the laser-firing technique [10]. Conversion efficiencies above 20% have been already reported in conventional (diffused-emitter) solar cells incorporating rear laser-fired contacts (LFC) through different passivation layers [11]- [13]. Alternative metallic sources to produce laser-fired contacts have also been tested in completed devices [14], [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to measure using SEM and SIMS, we cut the wafer as size of 8 x 8 mm 2 . The grooving laser had maximum output power of 10W and 532 nm output from Nd:YAG laser was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, different kinds of lasers [10] and alternative metallic sources [11] [12] have been successfully tested to produce laser-fired contacts (LFC) in complete solar cells. Conversion efficiencies over 20% [13] [14] were reported for a conventional diffused emitter, whereas in low-temperature heterojunction devices we have recently obtained efficiencies around 18% [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%