2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

20-F reconciliations and investment recommendations by financial professionals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the most favorably rated stocks outperform the least favorably rated stocks upon and following the announcements of recommendation changes (Womack, 1996;Barber et al, 2001;Krishnamoorthy et al, 2008). These empirical findings are consistent with Grossman and Stiglitz (1980) that information gatherers bring new information to the market to justify their compensation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In particular, the most favorably rated stocks outperform the least favorably rated stocks upon and following the announcements of recommendation changes (Womack, 1996;Barber et al, 2001;Krishnamoorthy et al, 2008). These empirical findings are consistent with Grossman and Stiglitz (1980) that information gatherers bring new information to the market to justify their compensation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This communication can be impaired by complexity and divergence in accounting standards. For example, Krishnamoorthy et al (2008) report that financial professional's investment recommendations were significantly lower for a firm when it reports a 20‐F reconciliation loss relative to when it reports a reconciliation gain, although the financial results were identical in all cases. With the world economies becoming more globalized, minimizing the differences among various accounting standards is highly desirable.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In regard to environmental investment, Nakamura's (2014) study showed that every company had different environmental performance due to differences in the characteristics of organization and industry. Other studies on environmental investment have also been conducted by several scholars (Jansson and Biel, 2011; Power et al , 2015; Krishnamoorthy et al , 2008; Sueyoshi and Goto, 2009; Banasik et al , 2010; Testa et al , 2015). Unfortunately, such studies are concentrated on the impact of environmental investment on firm performance and have ignored factors affecting companies in the implementation of environmental investment (Minatti Ferreira et al , 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%