In our target article (Jabès & Nelson, 2015), we reviewed our current knowledge on the emergence of explicit memory functions and the maturation of the brain regions that subserve them (in contrast to Nelson's 1995 article, we restricted our review to explicit memory and did not discuss implicit memory). We stressed the importance of considering the hippocampal formation as a complex set of distinct regions and circuits, exhibiting different profiles of structural maturation throughout development. Finally, we attempted to establish links between the emergence of different explicit memory functions and the gradual maturation of specific hippocampal circuits.Banta Lavenex and Lavenex (2015) emphasized the fact that the hippocampal formation consists of distinct regions and circuits, maturing gradually during development, and thus leading to the gradual emergence of distinct memory functions. They also stressed the need for more systematic investigations of memory development using various approaches such as genetic, electrophysiological or behavioral assessments. Indeed, our review raises questions and generates hypotheses that will need to be tested. Future research must further our understanding of the functional maturation of different memory circuits, within the hippocampal formation, but also circuits that lie outside this region. Moreover, as these authors quite rightly mentioned, it will be critical to better define the tasks used to assess memory throughout development as they might actually assess different cognitive processes at different ages.Mullally (2015) also emphasized the importance of considering the hippocampal formation as a set of distinct circuits, maturing gradually and underlying the differential emergence of different explicit memory functions. This author emphasized the need for more systematic studies in humans. Indeed, the available neuroanatomical data on the maturation of the hippocampal formation has been mainly collected in animals (rodents and monkeys) and most data on the function of the different hippocampal regions is derived from work on rodents and from computational models. Mullally mentioned the promises offered by advanced structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI/fMRI). However, to date, this technique does not provide the necessary resolution to study the neuroanatomical and functional maturation of specific hippocampal circuits. Although advances have made it possible to differentiate most hippocampal regions (with one notable exception being the dentate gyrus and the CA3, where the proximal CA3 is embedded within the layers of the dentate gyrus), it is impossible to describe fine maturational processes, such as the volumetric development of individual layers, or synaptic or cellular changes. Moreover, such techniques are not suitable for studying the functional development of hippocampal circuits during the first years of life, as doing so would require an awake, behaving, immobile child, which is not realistic when it comes to human infants. Nevertheles...