2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2004.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

20 years ago: British Homoeopathic Journal, July 1984

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Hoover [28] and Shepherd [38] the mortality rate during that epidemic was 5-16% among patients treated with homeopathy and 54-90% among patients treated conventionally. Homeopathy was also used in the 1854 epidemic in London [28,29,[39][40][41] once again with significant reduction of mortality rates.…”
Section: Evidences Of the Efficacy Of Homeopathy In Epidemic Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Hoover [28] and Shepherd [38] the mortality rate during that epidemic was 5-16% among patients treated with homeopathy and 54-90% among patients treated conventionally. Homeopathy was also used in the 1854 epidemic in London [28,29,[39][40][41] once again with significant reduction of mortality rates.…”
Section: Evidences Of the Efficacy Of Homeopathy In Epidemic Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those remarks notwithstanding, it should be admitted that the studies that used individualized remedies (symptom-based GE) for the treatment and prevention of epidemic diseases (homeoprophylaxis) are much more consistent, exhibit better methodological design and scientific documentation than the ones that performed isoprophylaxis, from the careful reports of Hahnemann of series of cases and prevention (scarlet fever, typhus, remittent fevers, cholera) [21-23, 25, 26, 37] to the more recent therapeutic and preventive protocols (influenza, cholera, dengue) [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Evidences On the Safety Of Homeoprophylaxis And Isoprophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%