2019
DOI: 10.1136/vr.l1903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

20 years of national wildlife disease surveillance

Abstract: The need for wildlife surveillance is as great now as it ever has been. Here, members of the APHA’s Diseases of Wildlife Scheme explain why their work is important.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, there are a large number of diseases that are under-surveyed. A large number of studies support surveillance programs as they improve the early detection of diseases [ 381 , 382 , 383 , 384 ]. These surveillance programs must have regular and effective monitoring protocols adapted to non-human primates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, there are a large number of diseases that are under-surveyed. A large number of studies support surveillance programs as they improve the early detection of diseases [ 381 , 382 , 383 , 384 ]. These surveillance programs must have regular and effective monitoring protocols adapted to non-human primates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wildlife diseases occur in numerous forms in a variety of animal species and populations around the globe. In addition, wildlife can serve as a reservoir for highly contagious and deadly diseases, many of which are infectious to domestic animals or humans, and may impact biodiversity [1,3] and the economy. Health monitoring and surveillance is an integral part of wildlife disease identification and management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zoonotic diseases have received attention in recent decades due to the emergence of pathogens resulting in epidemics and pandemics with substantial implications for public health, global economy and agricultural industry (Daszak, Cunningham, & Hyatt, 2000; Holmes et al., 2019). About 75% of emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic in origin, and wild animals are often their primary reservoirs (Cunningham, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 75% of emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic in origin, and wild animals are often their primary reservoirs (Cunningham, 2005). Examples of such pathogens include those causing tuberculosis and brucellosis, with implications for the agricultural industry (James & Rushton, 2002), and Ebola virus and SARS‐CoV‐2, causing disease outbreaks with grave economic and public health implications (Holmes et al., 2019; Wang, Horby, Hayden, & Gao, 2020). Zoonotic and other wildlife diseases also have substantial conservation consequences because they have been implicated as the cause of population decline of many wildlife species, including the African lion Panthera leo (attributed to canine distemper virus; Roelke‐Parker et al., 1996) and the African wild dog Lycaon pictus (caused by rabies; Alexander & Appel, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%